Roscoe Tanner vs Jiri Hrebec Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
R. Tanner vs J. Hrebec

Roscoe Tanner

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Jiri Hrebec

CZE

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-To-Head: Tanner 1 - 0 Hrebec

They have played 3 sets in total, with Roscoe Tanner winning 3 and Jiri Hrebec winning 0. The last match between Roscoe Tanner and Jiri Hrebec was at the Wimbledon, 23-06-1980, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with Roscoe Tanner getting the victory 6-2 6-0 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Tanner	1
Hrebec	0

Last H2H Matches:

(R1) Wimbledon(06-23-80)

Stats

Roscoe Tanner

Jiri Hrebec

R. Tanner vs J. Hrebec H2H Profile

R. Tanner	Stats	J. Hrebec
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
66.67% (604-302)	Career Total W/L	50.38% (197-194)
1	Grass	0
17	Titles	4
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

R. Tanner vs J. Hrebec Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jiri Hrebec has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Roscoe Tanner, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jiri Hrebec has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Roscoe Tanner has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jiri Hrebec has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Jiri Hrebec winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Roscoe Tanner has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 116/ 42), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 98/ 59). Jiri Hrebec has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 23/ 34).
Player level: In the last year, Roscoe Tanner has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Jiri Hrebec has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Roscoe Tanner winning 1 times and Jiri Hrebec being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Roscoe Tanner winning 3 and Jiri Hrebec winning 0. The last match between Roscoe Tanner and Jiri Hrebec was at the Wimbledon, 23-06-1980, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with Roscoe Tanner getting the victory 6-2 6-0 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Roscoe Tanner has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Jiri Hrebec has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jiri Hrebec has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Roscoe Tanner has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jiri Hrebec has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Roscoe Tanner vs Jiri Hrebec Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

R. Tanner vs J. Hrebec H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

R. Tanner	Stats	J. Hrebec
1	H2H Matches Won	0
3	Sets Won	0
18	Games Won	6
0:0:0	Avg. Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑5 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won → Match Won	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

R. Tanner Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Memphis - 28-01-1985
R2 Zoltan KuharszkyZ. Kuharszky	L	7-5 6-7 6-4	Stats
Tel Aviv - 10-09-1984
R3 Amos MansdorfA. Mansdorf	L	6-4 7-6	Stats
US Open - 28-08-1984
R1 Matt DoyleM. Doyle	L	6-2 6-2 6-4	Stats
Cincinnati - 20-08-1984
R2 Jimmy ConnorsJ. Connors	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Columbus - 13-08-1984
R3 Tim GulliksonT. Gullikson	L	5-7 6-2 6-1	Stats

View All

J. Hrebec Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Buchholz CH - 15-02-1982
R2 Jakob HlasekJ. Hlasek	L	6-4 5-7 6-2	Stats
Cologne - 26-10-1981
R3 Hartmut KirchhubelH. Kirchhubel	W	7-6 6-2	Stats
R4 Sammy Giammalva JrS. Giammalva	L	4-6 7-6 7-5	Stats
Vienna - 19-10-1981
R2 Sandy MayerS. Mayer	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
Barcelona - 05-10-1981
R2 Jan GunnarssonJ. Gunnarsson	L	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

R. Tanner vs J. Hrebec Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

R. Tanner	Stats	J. Hrebec
66.67% (604/302)	YTD Win/Loss	50.77% (197/191)
63.03% (1439/844)	Sets Win/Loss	50.94% (514/495)
54.41% (12342/10342)	Games Win/Loss	50.63% (4763/4644)
66.98% (215/106)	Hard Win/Loss	40.35% (23/34)
62.42% (98/59)	Clay Win/Loss	53.78% (128/110)
64.66% (161/88)	Indoor Hard W/L	46.67% (28/32)
73.42% (116/42)	Grass Win/Loss	53.57% (15/13)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
549.44	Average Opponent Rank	561.04
73.17% (90/33)	Slam W/L	47.73% (21/23)
54.39% (31/26)	Masters W/L	52.94% (9/8)
69.23% (9/4)	Cups W/L	58.62% (17/12)
66.48% (474/239)	Main Tour W/L	50.18% (141/140)
0% (0/0)	Challenger W/L	52.94% (9/8)
67% (505/759)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	50% (148/296)
67% (90/134)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	55% (47/85)
39% (15/38)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	73% (8/11)
56% (161/288)	Deciding Set Win %	52% (60/116)
86% (596/514)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (194/159)
14% (596/82)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (194/35)
28% (299/83)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (189/36)